|
News from Eva Wong's Most Recent Visit
Given the large number of people entering the Boston Shambhala Center's doors every day Sakyong Mipham Rinpoche has encouraged the community to work with feng shui master Eva Wong on finding a space in Boston that would allow us to continue to grow for many years to come. We are very much in the exploratory phase of a potential move but would like to share the transcript of Eva Wong's most recent visit in the vein of transparency.
May 19, 2007
Boston drive around with Eva Wong and Gina Stick
Carolyn Krusinski- driver
John Bailes- navigator
David Williams- recording
EW—Alright. OK. So we’re talking about Cambridge and Boston as two alternate sights
for the Shambhala Center. Each of them are going to be manifesting in a different way
for the center situated in either of those spaces.
First of all if you have it in Cambridge…Cambridge is much more inward looking
because it’s looking at the Charles River; whereas Boston has an outward orientation
towards the harbor and therefore a connection to the ocean giving more an expansive
approach.
In Cambridge the tendency, if you were to have a center there, the tendency of the center
is going to become a little bit more in-group and cliquish and less able to magnetize
people from the surrounding areas. So, for example, it would find it more difficult to get
people to come in from say Lexington, Medford, Concord or even Dedham and even
Somerville. Also because of its more academic, intellectual dralas associated with that
you’re going to tend to be a little bit academic, scholarly, and more mind oriented. I’m
not sure if that’s a good thing.
In Boston (a center location in Boston) you tend to be a little bit more worldly. I think
Boston Shambhala Center’s orientation needs to be more worldly wisdom and a little bit
more connected with the ocean and going overseas, especially given that Boston and NY
and seaboard Shambhala Centers are jump-off points in connecting with Europe. I think
Boston is critical in supporting the European centers especially the one in Ireland.
There’s always been a very close connection between Boston center, and the Irish
centers.
Whereas I think in Cambridge it tends.. it’s going to be much more toward..you would be
reinforcing each others views rather than taking in views from other cultures and
subcultures…would be less ethnic. I mean I think the best way to describe it would be
you would have a WASP-ish setup-Shambhala WASP-ish (if in Cambridge) or you
would be able to absorb streams of influence from other cultures which Boston can get
very rich in.
So that would be the characteristics, general characteristics of the centers.
So we’re looking at areas within Boston. One thing about the South End and Back Bay is
that they are quite connected to the other communities and neighborhoods in Boston,
whereas the convention Center and the Waterfront are cut off; they are a pocket.
So what you see is an area that may look very vibrant in and of its own, but it would be
very difficult to get people to go in there because it’s what is called a touristy trend
zipp?? place. If you look at the map it’s obvious..Mass Pike cuts it and isolates it. It’s too
isolated and away from Boston. If you look at the map the Seaport area is looking away
from Boston rather than looking towards the communities of Boston.
We’re in Back Bay. Back Bay has the feel of neighborhood that is still up and coming;
it’s still transforming.
GS- I like the feel here,not too residential (has) institutional power. Back Bay has a lot of
promise.
EW- Well Shambhala Publications is near here. And then of course Christian Science is
here.
The South End is going to be..it’s a very neighborhood type of place so if you’re in the
South End you will tend to be..shape yourself more like a neighborhood type of center,
whereas I think Back Bay allows you to radiate more to be more as Gina says you will be
an institution rather than just a special interest group.
I think (in the) South End you would end up taking on the characteristics of a special
interest group whereas here you’d radiate better in Back Bay. Back Bay is more
international, bigger. This is a very vibrant area and obviously of course the real estate is
going to be expensive, however, you could be still on the outskirts of this area. I would
recommend instead of going towards more the business side if you were to look here…
go more towards the brownstone side. People buy up these old buildings, renovate them
and they become instantly million dollar properties.
GS- If you wind up in a more residential area, a free standing building that has more
embassy, stately presence where it stands out in the neighborhood…
EW- That would be good. Yes, you, will. We’re looking at a green building on a corner,
but something on the corner that gives you exposure; that would be good. Then of course
the next, if you want to be even better is you get a stand alone building and you take over
the entire building, which is what the people in Vienna did. So they have a three level
building. So they have sort of a Shambhala Café downstairs, the social area. They give
lots of public programs there, so it’s an outer.. Then they have administrators in the
second floor and the shrine rooms on the top.
GS- It’s more embassy-like.
EW- Go into more a little the residential zone.
GS- If you did it here… you’d be a floor with a lot of other people. It’s equally powerful
if you have your own building. You stand alone; stand out. Those also have a lot of
elegance sometimes.
EW- Yeah, they do. I think that if you look at and have seen some very beautiful practice
centers of other spiritual traditions that convert three levels… The Zen Center in Toronto.
It’s an absolutely gorgeous space.
CK- Up and down Marlborough. (Marlborough and Dartmouth.. area of 53 Marlborough
Street)
EW- Like something like these- these buildings. If you are able to design your opening
entrance then it will stand out. You have to deal with zone problems too if indeed you can
have…Like this one- obviously a commercial building- they did it different; they’re
standing out. (now) These don’t have horizon. (Marlborough and Berkley St) You don’t
want to be on Storrow Drive anyway because it’s an expressway. Looking on this side
(south of Storrow drive) is fine, but you don’t want to be straight up against Storrrow
Drive.
Now this on the other side of Beacon, that’s the side away from Storrow Drive. These are
fine, not a problem. They open up to sky; they are pretty good on sky energy. Again you
have to check what the zoning is like.
GS- Is there interest in co-housing in Boston?
JB- Cambridge is more co-housing.
EW- …that suits Boston completely because of the scholastic and intellectual dralas
around here this would be a study place and destination… Urban campus with a Mipham
Academy.
GS- Some of these things aren’t needed but enhancements if they could help financially if
you found a building.
EW- for businesses
GS- or for housing
(Driving close to Boston University)
EW- Too big…cut by railroad…(the MBTA)
We’re crossing the BU bridge. If we have time on the way back we can visit the South
End. Actually, this is getting close to where Jonathon Green lives. Until you hit Central
Square, then it starts to open up. Inman Square and that area…is very neighborhood
dependent. Kendall Square..this is very neighborhood specific. I think you will be buried
by MIT if you are here because they are the dominant force. Hi -tech, bio-research..you
don’t want to be buried by an institution that is too big. If you were by Harvard Square,
you’d be buried by Harvard. If you were near BU you’d be buried by them. The
overwhelming dominance of a certain type of activity can swamp us. We need to be in an
area where it’s very diverse, where everybody quote has a good chance of doing uniquely
what they do instead of being buried by a corporate university.
JB- ..building is Frank Gehry..you’ll see it.
EW- It looks pretty bad. Look at that. It’s so bad. It’s so bad.
GS- He’s so popular. He’s the latest genius. ..deconstructionist.
EW- Well, whatever name it is it looks bad. That’s enough.
JB- what they do in there is synthetic biology.
EW- Equally scary.
GS- This is inhuman.
EW- University hi-tech. You will be buried by them and swamped by them.
GS-It’s a zone separated by the fabric of Boston. It’s dead at night.
JB- residential and retail commercial. Genzyme won awards for sustainability (for the building)
EW- It looks pretty bad- You can have a sustainable building and be very destructive.
None of these have the yun factor.
These buildings are OK but in the wrong neighborhoods. (close to Science Museum)
Go away from the Science Museum because going in that direction is going into bland
land. Good land, bad land, bland land.
Another kind of building to consider is are defunct bank buildings. Bank buildings have a
squat??? type. That’s very elegant.
Now this has some sky energy.
JB- Inman Square
GS- patchwork-is it a transitional area?
EW- decaying area. It’s not corporate university. You would still have that very
cliquish…would enrich itself rather than look outside.
GS- may be more innovative…
EW--Yes it’s innovative, but innovation within. Sometimes when you go out you need
less innovative. This would have center enriching each other and attracting same kind of
people. In Boston you have a chance of attracting more diverse group of people.
The dam is very destructive to the Charles River drala system. ( Longfellow Bridge
area?) These are the duck vehicles. Have you ever seen them? They’re amphibious. They
go into the river.
CK- Tony, Charles Street. The Brahmin Back Bay, Beacon Hill spot.
EW- Very historic. This is very difficult to get into in all aspects. It’s very closed-in area.
And very exclusive, so if you do end up having something here you’d be excluding
people. It’s not cut-off- they’re very narrow. Beacon Hill is very, very exclusive.
We’re heading to open area. Boston Gardens. Expensive, prime.
Newbury Street is like…hum.m.m. But Wisdom Pubs is on Newbury St. They got a good
spot. The spaces are small. What are you gonna do? Hey lots of possibilities.
GS- First floor of charter school looks vacant.
Entering South End—Tremont and East Berkeley
EW- Once again. I don’t think we want bohemian. I think those days are over. Boston
Ballet here. That’s a nice building. (19 Clarendon Street) It’s such an elegance to it.
Cambridge is much more bohemian. It still needs taming. I think that we’ve tamed.
We’re not at the stage of taming anymore. We want to be at the stage of at least enriching
if not magnetizing. Taming has to do with dignity. I think we’ve got dignity. Enriching
has to do with elegance. We need to work on that. Opulence has to do with magnetizing.
Those three energies… So I think we should..we’re at the elegance stage. I think South
End has that. Cambridge doesn’t have that because it’s too mixed and still too bohemian.
The scale here suits your development at this point. Even if you can get into a side street
of South End it would work. The nature of parking is that you have to get to the outskirts to get your parking.
This looks like an old church. Let’s take a look. Yeah. (Concord Baptist Church- 190
Warren Street) So far this (area) is still very good. I’ll tell you where the boundary is
when we get to it.
Yes a brownstone of this nature (would work) and you have a three level center.
Mass Ave is a barrier because it’s such a big street. WE should go a bit further and I’ll
tell you to see where it really drops off. A lot of what today is an educational experience
for all of you is to see where it drops off. It’s just dropping off now. (Columbus and
Camden street??) The thing is to see where it absolutely won’t work.
(heading towards back side of Northeastern University) Again that’s another big
educational institution; you could be swamped by them. We’ve gotten there. This is
Northeastern land. There’s plenty of parking here. We’re still off the drala map. This is a
wasteland.
GS-Well it doesn’t have character. No yun.
EW- We’re still in the low zone. We’re not back up.
Beginning to climb up. That’s good . You guys are learning. You’re picking up the lungta
of the neighborhoods. That’s a dignified building.
This is transitional and has a lot of promise. You don’t want to be next to a cemetery, but
if you are at least 2-3 blocks from it it’s alright.
This depends on how they renovate it. You need to see the front. ( Franklin Square
…Washington and E. Newton Street)
This one is lha- something like this one.. a more unique building. So you could occupy
one floor and still be able to be workable. Stone has got power.
JB- an area of community gardens.
EW- Well this is pretty problematic. The lungta is low even if it is a community gardens-
squatters, shack energy.
The community gardens where Charlie is- oh those are beautiful.
Small banks…I’d be very nervous about those. This needs a lot of work- that is definitely
a fixer-upper. (Waltham Street….left on Washington Street --1234 Washington Street)
So you’d have to build up a huge project. Yes head back because of the Werma feast. We
don’t want to hold that up.
That’s nice; I like that building. I like those buildings ( close to 553 Tremont Street)
JB- an old church…
GS- It’s pretty hard to convert a Christian space.
EW- Very very hard. You’d have to spend a lot of energy transforming it. But why spend
all that energy when you can get a space that you don’t have to transform and you spend
that same energy enriching…very practical.
(Some comment about the previous church space in Newton)
EW- You weren’t strong enough to occupy that other one. You may be able to do it now.
(in the symphony plaza west area) That’s the Shambhala Publications building. It’s all
occupied. Well, the Symphony Hall and the Berklee School of Music is not too far from
here. Christian Science Monitor and their publications are also there.
Eleven Fenway, twenty two. I took classes at the NE Conservatory of Music …
full transcript not posted
< back to Expansion News
|